<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martian Thoughts on Design &#187; eBook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/tag/ebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com</link>
	<description>Design, Web Development, and Interesting Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A few thoughts on Apple&#8217;s iPad announcement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/apples-ipad-announcement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apples-ipad-announcement</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/apples-ipad-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, like many Tech aficionados, I was eagerly following the posts about Apple&#8217;s new iPad. And I must say that I&#8217;m quite interested in the device. First let me say that I was a little taken aback when I looked over at Yahoo&#8217;s Tech Blog, and those guys panned it. They pointed out all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, like many Tech aficionados, I was eagerly following the posts about Apple&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">iPad</a>.  And I must say that I&#8217;m quite interested in the device.</p>
<p>First let me say that I was a little taken aback when I looked over at <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs;_ylt=Ao_hdqKYmkuHI.TYnQAVIKQFLZA5">Yahoo&#8217;s Tech Blog</a>, and those guys panned it.  They pointed out all the things that the rumor mill said it would do that it didn&#8217;t.  Sorry dudes, there is only so much tech you can cram into a device this size without blowing a massive whole in your unit cost.  </p>
<p><span id="more-212"></span>Would a <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/">Flash plug-in</a> be nice to have?  How about a camera?  Multiple processes running?  Sure, all of these would be nice, but they aren&#8217;t really make or break, are they?  Besides, the software stuff can be added later on, if necessary.  No one else is producing anything like this.  Although I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be trying to copy it soon.</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/patterson/64364;_ylt=Ag4AaJq3LM2b8jOdFPgP2XYWLpA5">Ben Patterson</a> seemed to be missing the point the most.  This is NOT an oversized iPhone, without the phone.  But if you start thinking of this as an eBook reader, or as a media pad, it&#8217;s easy to see why this device is so interesting.</p>
<p>You might say that this is an oversized iPod Touch. I personally have never understood the point of the Touch, when you could just get the iPhone, but apparently millions of people disagree with me. </p>
<p>But the iPad, I GET!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/tablet-mania-at-ces/">As I talked about a couple of weeks ago</a>, I&#8217;m really quite interested in getting an eBook reader. Apple&#8217;s new iPad just buried that market.  Why on earth would anyone be interested in a <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-10428337-269.html?tag=mncol;title">Que</a> or a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0015TG12Q/ref=sa_menu_kdxi3?pf_rd_p=328655101&#038;pf_rd_s=left-nav-1&#038;pf_rd_t=101&#038;pf_rd_i=507846&#038;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&#038;pf_rd_r=1XP1HPPBFMNDB18XYVBP">Kindle DX</a>, when they could get this device for the same price, with so much more capability?  Sure it may not look great on the beach in the sun, but it plays videos and games, does email, and has a real web browser.  </p>
<p>I completely don&#8217;t get people who try to read books on the little screen that is on the Touch or the iPhone.  I never understood it on my old Compaq iPaq, and I certainly don&#8217;t understand it now.   Nor do I really want to have to peer past a keyboard when I&#8217;m trying to read a book, so Netbooks are out.  But give me this nice 9.7&#8243; screen, and I&#8217;ll be buying most of my books either through iTunes or through <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ebooks/index.asp">Barnes &#038; Noble&#8217;s eBookstore</a>.  With any luck we&#8217;ll be able to buy an eBook through the BN eBookstore and drag it onto our iTunes library, since they both use the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB">ePub format</a>.  If not, Barnes &#038; Noble&#8217;s eReader app will certainly be on the iPad. </p>
<p>Also this device seems like a total win for college students.  You&#8217;ll be able to take all your books to class on one device, plus jam out a few notes if you like. </p>
<p>My second major use case for this device is when you&#8217;re in your living room watching TV. There are many times, when I&#8217;m watching <a href="http://www.history.com/">The History Channel</a> or <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/">The Discovery Channel</a>, in which I want to go look up something on the web.  Right now I do that on my iPhone, but I can&#8217;t say that&#8217;s an optimal experience.  With the iPad, this would be a lot more convenient.  Same thing goes if I want to play one of my games.  Whipping out my phone works, but this will be a much better experience on the iPad. </p>
<p>Now a few words about what the iPad is not. It&#8217;s not a full-blown computer. I will not create websites or write up blog posts on this thing.  Nor would I want to compose long emails on it, any more than I&#8217;d do that on my iPhone.  Those things are what a laptop is for. </p>
<p>But if you take the iPad for what it is, it&#8217;s a damn interesting device, and pretty reasonably priced.  I think Apple will sell quite a few of these.  </p>
<p>Will I be one of them this year?  No.  I tend to prefer to wait until hardware version 2, before I jump into this.  Better to let them work out some of the kinks.  But still&#8230;.I&#8217;m very interested in heading down to the Apple store and playing with one of these in the coming months.</p>
<p>Just my two cents.</p>
<p>[Update] For a list of things missing, but with a good analysis of why they&#8217;re not there, check out <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/ten-things-missing-from-the-ipad/">Charlie Sorrel&#8217;s post over at Wired.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/apples-ipad-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tablet Mania at CES</title>
		<link>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/tablet-mania-at-ces/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tablet-mania-at-ces</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/tablet-mania-at-ces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnes & Noble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Que]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I&#8217;m going to talk briefly about technology.  All this business about tablets, netbooks and e-readers is really generating lots of hype in the press.  Personally I&#8217;d love to have an e-reader or tablet, so I can stop filling up my bookshelf.  I&#8217;ve been preparing myself for a black and white screen, until the technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I&#8217;m going to talk briefly about technology.  All this business about tablets, netbooks and e-readers is really generating lots of hype in the press.  Personally I&#8217;d love to have an e-reader or tablet, so I can stop filling up my bookshelf.  I&#8217;ve been preparing myself for a black and white screen, until the technology improves.  But then I saw <a href="http://www.mirasoldisplays.com/index-mirasol-display-technology.php">Qualcomm&#8217;s Mirasol color screen</a>, so now I&#8217;m hoping for good color offerings in e-readers/tablet soon.</p>
<p><span id="more-194"></span>I was really looking forward to seeing what <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-10428337-269.html?tag=mncol;title">Plastic Logic did with their Que</a>.  Unfortunately it looks like they missed the mark&#8230;.at least for me.</p>
<p>They seem to have fallen into the classic mistake made by hardware manufacturers&#8230;..getting caught up in the device specs, then convincing themselves that some screwy use case is what consumers want.  I&#8217;m trying to figure out what the point of having AT&amp;T 3G connectivity is, if you can&#8217;t upload documents that way, and there is no web browser.  E-mail? ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.</p>
<p>Am I still interested in the Que as an e-reader?  Maybe.  At those prices?  Definitely not!  If it had at least the same capability, preferably more capability, than the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Wireless-Reading-Display-Generation/dp/B0015TG12Q/ref=amb_link_17949962_3?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_s=center-1&amp;pf_rd_r=05CGTJ763RGBY3S61VDT&amp;pf_rd_t=101&amp;pf_rd_p=51296782&amp;pf_rd_i=507846">Kindle DX</a>, and was similarly priced, then I&#8217;d probably be all over it.  For that price, it&#8217;d need to have a LOT MORE capability, not LESS. </p>
<p>Why not just get a Kindle DX?  I don&#8217;t want to be locked into their weird format. The <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nook/index.asp">Nook</a> is quite interesting, but a bit too small for the type of books I mostly buy. I need something that is good for Textbook size reading, with graphics, charts, figures, etc. That&#8217;s why I had such hope for the Que.  </p>
<p>Is the <a href="http://www.skiff.com/skiff-reader.html">Skiff</a> the right product?  The device looks interesting. Unfortunately, there are still too many things up in the air at this point, like pricing, store access and format considerations.  As for the Service/Store, I can&#8217;t find a lot of detail about it yet, but the website says their service is &#8220;Publisher-friendly&#8221;.  If we use the music or video industry as a guide, that means it will be a bad deal for consumers.  I&#8217;d also feel a little more comfortable about the store offered by Barnes &amp; Noble or Borders than some company I&#8217;ve never heard of.  But I&#8217;ll wait for further details.</p>
<p>It seems to me that there are a ton of companies pursuing this, and your dollar.  Dell, HP and many others are hyping their offerings. So far, no one has hit a home run in my book.  Most of them are completely blowing it, due to some poor choices like Plastic Logic&#8217;s or <a href="http://ces.cnet.com/8301-31045_1-10428571-269.html">Dell&#8217;s ridiculously small screen</a>.</p>
<p>Later this month, we&#8217;ll presumably see what Apple has to offer.  So far they&#8217;re the only company who&#8217;s really figured out a nice UI with their iPhone interface.  I don&#8217;t think this interface is completely appropriate for a tablet, so I hope they throw something even more impressive at us later this month.  Will I rush right out and be an early adopter? One word&#8230;..No!  I think we&#8217;ll need to wait at least one generation for them to get some of the kinks worked out.</p>
<p>So here I am, waiting for a really interesting device to replace my bookshelf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.martiangraphix.com/2010/01/tablet-mania-at-ces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

